SPEAK NOW OR FOREVER WEAR YOUR SHACKLES

LAWS ARE ALREADY IN PLACE THAT WILL ELIMINATE FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT ENTIRELY WITHIN THE NEXT FEW YEARS. YOUR EDUCATION, UNDERSTANDING AND ACTION ARE REQUIRED FOR YOUR OWN LIBERTY.

INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT & JOBS ACT

KEEP IN MIND AT THE OUTSET… THIS BILL HAS ALREADY PASSED!

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684), signed into law on November 15, 2021, was presented as a historic piece of bipartisan legislation aimed at revitalizing the United States’ infrastructure. Boasting a $1.2 trillion price tag, with $550 billion in new federal spending, the law was meant to address aging roads, bridges, broadband expansion, public transportation, and energy infrastructure. Its proponents hailed it as a long-overdue investment in the nation’s backbone, promising job creation, economic growth, and modernized infrastructure to support future generations. Meanwhile, boasting of 1.2 trillion spent, only further raised our already outrageous national debt that already can never be paid back, AND WORSE YET, HAS BEGUN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CONTROL OF EVERYONE’S MOVEMENT.

The Purpose of H.R. 3684

The bill’s primary focus was on revitalizing public works and ensuring that the nation’s critical infrastructure could meet the demands of a growing and evolving economy. Some of its key provisions included:

• Transportation Investments – Over $110 billion was allocated for roads, bridges, and major projects to improve traffic efficiency and safety.
• Public Transit and Rail – With $66 billion for passenger rail, including Amtrak, and $39 billion for public transit, the bill sought to modernize transportation alternatives.
• Broadband Expansion – Recognizing the digital divide in rural and underserved communities, the bill provided $65 billion to improve internet access. Read on to see it’s actual purpose.
• Energy and Climate Initiatives – $65 billion was dedicated to power grid improvements, clean energy, and electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure. Read on to see it’s actual purpose.
• Water and Environmental Protections – $55 billion was directed toward clean water infrastructure, including replacing lead pipes.

Despite these purported benefits, most of which have failed miserably (a story for another day), H.R. 3684 also contained provisions that expanded government oversight and intervention, raising alarming concerns among those who value privacy, personal liberty, and constitutionally protected rights. This, of course, should be alarming to every American on the republic. Yet, more than likely, not even you have heard about the provision we are discussing in this article. I do not think that this inclusion had any noble purpose whatsoever. Congressmen/woman do not read the bills on which they vote. They vote for bills because the PACs (“that keep contributing obscene amounts of cash” to their re-elections) tell them to. And most of the provision are detrimental to the all-but-evaporated “republic for which we stand”.

How H.R. 3684 Has Been Abused

While its goal may have appeared noble on paper, H.R. 3684 has faced considerable scrutiny for provisions that extend beyond traditional infrastructure spending. Over time, various sections of the bill have been leveraged in ways that inarguably overstep constitutional limits and infringe upon individual rights.

1.     Surveillance and Vehicle Control Measures

• One of the most controversial aspects of the bill is Section 24220, which mandates that automakers incorporate drunk driving prevention technology into all new passenger vehicles. This provision is the epitome of government overreach!. And the potentiality and probability for nefarious use of surveillance data and control of the population is guaranteed.
• Critics (that is to say, anyone that enjoys freedom) argue that preventing a few impaired drivers pales in comparison to a technology that monitors all of our movements in real-time and can be used against us by both hackers, and rogue, tyrannical governments. The capability of tracking drivers and even remotely disabling vehicles is absolutely tyrannical and yet it is already law and manufacturers are already installing the equipment in new cars! Can you imagine… You swerve to miss a pedestrian. … Good for you! You were alert and prevented an accident. But, now, the local police department has been notified that you are  impaired and the car pulls itself over and shuts itself off and locks the doors. Now, you sit and wait for a code enforcer who will proceed to harass and embarrass you on the side of the road. And, if you angrily complain as you certainly have the right to do, you will end up harassed more and likely hauled off to jail! NO GOOD CAN COME FROM THIS AND IT MUST BE STOPPED DEAD IN ITS TRACKS REGARDLESS OF HOW MUCH MONEY MANUFACTURERS HAVE ALREADY SPENT.

2.     Expansion of Government Powers Without Clear Oversight

• The bill provides unprecedented funding to various government agencies without strict accountability mechanisms. For example, $50 billion was allocated to “climate resilience,” but critics argue that these funds have been funneled into programs that lack transparency and do not directly serve their intended purpose. Just where is this money going? Could it be subsidizing the very technologies and infrastructure that will track us in our cars everywhere we go? Could it be subsidizing the system that can shut our cars off without our permission? Could it be subsidizing an industry that will go “autonomous” so that we aren’t even controlling our cars anymore?  You and I are becoming slaves because you haven’t raised enough hell. I am. And you need to. Sorry if I sound like I’m lecturing you… well… no I’m not. You and I are the only ones that can do anything about this and in the self-interest of my own liberty, “you need to get involved”. Oh, did I mention you will be a prisoner, too? Something to think about… “before it’s too late”!
• The broadband funding, while seemingly beneficial for rural communities, is enabling the tech infrastructure that the corporate and government partnerships will use to collect every kind of data possible including biometric and identification. “All under the guise of expanding internet access!”

3.     Corporate Handouts and Misuse of Funds

• A significant portion of the infrastructure bill was set aside for “green energy projects”, many of which have mismanaged the funds egregiously. Taxpayer dollars have been funneled into companies that, in some cases, have failed to deliver promised results, while at the same time building the infrastructure that will monitor us 24/7 to the same degree as China, and to a degree never before seen in history.
• The bill also included subsidies for electric vehicle manufacturers, which large corporations use to create the Big Brother Infrastructure. Its your taxes! … “YOU ARE PAYING FOR THE OPEN AIR INTERNMENT CAMP!”

4.     Burdens on Small Businesses and Individuals

• Some regulatory provisions in H.R. 3684 impose stricter requirements on businesses, particularly in the transportation and logistics industries.

• The increased government involvement in infrastructure with all of its subsidies to major corporations that are “playing the technocracy game”,  are further choking out small businesses. Bad for liberty… great for a dystopian government that controls everything. Kind of like, “North Korea”?! Wow! They have it so good there, you know!

Conclusion

Hopefully you have figured out by now that this is the most invasive intrusion on your liberty that has ever occurred in the history of this nation… the nation whose promise to its nationals is “liberty and justice for all”.

While the “Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act” was framed as a necessary step forward for America’s infrastructure, its implementation is obvious governmental overreach, financial abuse, and “constitutional violation”. One of the most egregious provisions is Section 24220.

---

Section 24220

A Trojan Horse for Government Overreach

Section 24220 of H.R. 3684 mandates the integration of Advanced Impaired Driving Technology in all newly manufactured vehicles, aiming to prevent impaired driving through automated systems. While the stated purpose is to reduce traffic fatalities caused by intoxicated drivers, the reality of this provision presents a host of constitutional and ethical dilemmas.

Proposed Benefits of Section 24220

Supporters of this provision argue that it will:

• Reduce Drunk Driving Fatalities– By preventing impaired individuals from operating a vehicle, the system aims to curb the thousands of annual DUI-related deaths.
• Enhance Road Safety– Automated monitoring could also deter reckless driving behavior and improve traffic conditions.
• Lower Insurance Costs– Fewer accidents could lead to reduced insurance premiums, benefiting responsible drivers.

However, while these benefits seem appealing, they come at a significant cost to privacy, autonomy, and personal freedom.

The Dangers of Biometric Surveillance and the ‘Kill Switch’

Section 24220 requires biometric technology and other monitoring systems that:

• Continuously analyze driver behavior through eye tracking, facial recognition, and physiological indicators.
• Detect alcohol levels via passive breath sensors or touch-based devices embedded in steering wheels.
• Limit or completely disable vehicle operation if impairment is detected.

The dangers of such a system are vast:

1. Privacy Violations – Data collected from biometric surveillance will be stored, shared, and exploited by government agencies and corporations without consent.
2. Hacking and Malfunctions – A vehicle that can be remotely disabled presents a massive cybersecurity risk, leaving drivers vulnerable to hacking.
3. Government Overreach – The probability of misuse is certain, where authorities will use the ‘kill switch’ not just for drunk drivers but for broader law enforcement or social compliance measures.
4. False Positives and Restricted Mobility – Imperfect technology will misidentify impairment, leaving drivers stranded or unjustly penalized.

Conclusion

While preventing impaired driving is a noble goal, the method proposed by Section 24220 creates an alarming precedent for mass surveillance, automated enforcement, and expanded governmental power. The intersection of biometric monitoring and centralized control over private vehicles raises profound questions about civil liberties, making this one of the most contentious and intrusive measures embedded within H.R. 3684.

---

Legal and Constitutional Challenges to Section 24220

1. Fourth Amendment Violations – Mandatory biometric monitoring is, in point of fact, unlawful search and seizure.
2. Due Process Issues – The ability to disable a vehicle without a fair legal process “infringes on basic rights”.
3. Lawsuits and Pushback – Several civil liberties groups have signaled pointed out the probable lawsuits against the provision.

Efforts to Repeal or Limit Implementation

1. Legislative Efforts – Lawmakers have introduced bills seeking to delay or remove the provision. However, all efforts to date have failed.
2. State-Level Resistance – Some states are challenging the measure, arguing it violates state sovereignty.
3. Public Advocacy and Opposition – Citizen groups and advocacy organizations are rallying against the provision. However, there needs to be much more involvement of “we, the people”.

Conclusion

The legal and constitutional challenges facing Section 24220 are vast, with concerns about privacy, autonomy, and governmental overreach at the forefront. The next chapter will explore the ongoing efforts to combat and potentially overturn this provision.

---

The Implications for Personal Freedom, Privacy, and the Future of Driving in America

I often speak and write about the issue of our entering into “legal” contracts, and that with the proper knowledge, you can have most of your liberties restored (or obtained for the first time in your life). Our status and understanding of the legal system is an issue that requires all Americans’ attention so that we can replace this rogue statutory “legal” system. It actually has no power over us except by our own consent (which they deceitfully obtain from the unwitting masses).

But, this issue of “Big Brother” being installed into our permanent lives via automobile, “smart” phone and “smart” appliances must be addressed rapidly. And, to do so, we must spread the word about what is happening and make sure that every person that learns about this issue contacts their representatives on every level.. state, federal, governors, presidential administration.

The implementation of Section 24220 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684) represents a seismic shift in the relationship between individuals and the vehicles they own. This provision, which mandates the integration of Advanced Impaired Driving Technology, fundamentally changes the role of cars from private modes of transportation to “government-monitored and controlled assets”. While its proponents argue that this technology is necessary to enhance road safety, its ramifications extend far beyond traffic management. The implications for personal freedom, privacy, and individual liberty are vast and alarming. In fact, “it utterly decimates all three“!

Privacy Concerns: The Mass Surveillance of Drivers

The most immediate and concerning aspect of the mandated Advanced Impaired Driving Technology is mass surveillance! The technology required to detect impairment relies on intrusive biometric monitoring systems, including:

• Eye-tracking and facial recognition to detect signs of drowsiness or intoxication.
• Passive breath sensors embedded within the vehicle to measure blood alcohol concentration.
• Touch-based sensors on steering wheels or gear shifts to measure alcohol levels through skin contact.
• AI-driven behavior analysis to detect erratic driving, hesitation, or reaction times.

These systems will require continuous monitoring of drivers, meaning that every American who operates a vehicle will be subject to government-mandated biometric scanning. The implications of such a system include:

1. Violation of the Fourth Amendment – The right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures is in direct conflict with mandatory biometric surveillance without a warrant or probable cause.
2. Data Collection and Retention – The government and private corporations will store, analyze, and sell driver data, which, in point of fact, is unauthorized surveillance and collection of data.
3. Expansion of Surveillance Networks – If biometric technology becomes standard in vehicles, it will rapidly and inevitably be used for law enforcement tracking, social credit systems, and behavioral monitoring beyond just impairment detection.

The ‘Kill Switch’ and Government Overreach

One of the most alarming aspects of Section 24220 is the potential for a remote kill switch in all vehicles. If the system determines a driver is impaired, it can automatically disable the vehicle, preventing operation. This creates a dangerous precedent in which the government (or even third-party actors) could remotely disable privately owned vehicles.

Abuses of the kill switch include:

1. Government Control Over Movement – In times of national emergency or civil unrest, or whenever the government wishes to exert control over you, authorities will shut down vehicles, selectively or ”en masse‘, inhibiting individuals’ ability to travel freely. Preventing your movement is technically, lawfully and legally considered “false imprisonment”.
2. Selective Enforcement – Those deemed a “threat” by government agencies could have their mobility restricted arbitrarily. What constitutes a threat? Did you tweet something “harmful”!?!?
3. Hacker Vulnerability – If the system is compromised, malicious actors could disable cars nationwide, leading to chaos and economic disruption. A perfect component of a terror attack. Disable an entire region and have your way with everyone in it. Islam?! False Flag!? Take your pick… It’s coming.
4. False Positives and Glitches – Malfunctions in the system could wrongfully disable vehicles, leaving innocent drivers stranded without recourse. Imagine, your wife is out driving in a bad section of town… And her perfume gets picked up as a high alcohol content. Her car stops in the middle of a really bad neighborhood and no on is there to help her if she needs it! What could possibly go wrong? Imagine Big Brother decides you shouldn’t be driving at the moment you are going 60 mph on the freeway. And, BAM! The car shuts down! Even if it pulls you over, you are in a precarious position that Big Brother cannot predict or know about, and they sure as hell won’t be responsible for any damage or loss of life.

The End of Car Ownership?

With the introduction of government-mandated biometric monitoring and remote disablement technology, the very concept of personal car ownership goes up in flames. As it stands, you are registering your car, converting it to a state owned “motor vehicle” (that is why your car can be impounded if you don’t meet their criteria.. AND IT’S THE ONLY REASON!). But, add to that, complete control over where you go and what you do and if you even can go somewhere, and all bets are off. Remember the phrase, “you will own nothing and be happy”!?!?!? Well? … Do you!?!? … It is coming much sooner than you think if you do not take action and reverse this legislation this year ! Next year’s cars are required to have this dystopian equipment. Which means it has already been developed and engineered into the models that are about to be manufactured.

The increasing trend toward automation, electric vehicles, and centralized control over transportation aligns with a broader push toward mobility as a service (MaaS) rather than individually owned cars. Imagine your children growing up discussing “MaaS” never knowing that people once were free to travel the world! IMAGINE! … and then… DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

Consequences include:

1. Dependence on Government-Approved Transportation – When personal vehicles become too restrictive, too costly, or outright made illegal, people will be forced to rely on public or corporate-controlled transportation options. the wealthy might get to sit in their own car that they can’t drive or control. Prison alone! Wow! Sounds like fun!
2. Restricted Vehicle Access – Driving privileges will be tied to digital identification, vaccination status, or any and all arbitrary government compliance in unrelated areas. Can you say, “Welcome to China!”??
3. Subscription-Based Vehicle Use – Instead of owning cars, individuals will be forced into a rental or ride-share economy controlled by corporate entities working in tandem with regulators. Ask Klaus Schwab and the WEF! Remember? “Whatever you need… you will rent.” … straight from the mouths of the WEF overlords….along with the traditional, “you will own nothing and be happy”.

Social and Economic Ramifications

The broader societal implications of these policies are staggering. By enforcing biometric tracking and movement restrictions, the government will exert unprecedented control over “we, the people’s” everyday lives.

• Employment Impacts – Professionals who rely on driving (truckers, couriers, sales representatives) will lose their jobs to false positives or overreach, or misbehaving with those social media posts!
• Rural and Low-Income Disadvantage – People everywhere will be at a disadvantage if everyone must use public transportation. But underdeveloped areas will literally paralyze the movement of the people in those areas. Can you say, “15 minute city”!? What did you think that was all about, anyway!? You are being prepared!
• Insurance and Financial Exploitation – Car insurance companies could leverage biometric data to hike rates or deny coverage based on algorithmic risk assessments, potentially discriminating against certain demographics. This will be an issue in the transition period, while you are still behind the wheel of the car. Once everything is autonomous, there would be no need for insurance. Lots of litigation will be happening there I am sure. How could you be held liable when the law says you can’t even drive??? …. Huh???

The Slippery Slope: What Comes Next?

The implementation of Advanced Impaired Driving Technology is merely the beginning. If this precedent (which has already been codified into law) is implemented , it opens the door for further expansions of government-mandated control over private transportation:

• Automatic Speed Enforcement – Cars could be prevented from exceeding speed limits, regardless of necessity (e.g., emergencies). Or, the more likely possibility is that you will receive many automatic demerits for every time you speed. And, those demerits will come right out of your bank account. Because FEDNOW and digital currency (CBDC) is already being developed and implemented! You really need to get hip to these things and become politically active. Thier “2030 -talk” looks more feasible with each passing day. Fix all this now or our lives will suck.
• Geofencing Restrictions – Certain areas could be restricted, and vehicles could be prevented from traveling beyond designated zones. Perfect for the implementation of 15 minutes cities…
• Driver Conduct Scoring – A ‘social credit’ style driving score will be used to determine who can own or operate a vehicle… GUARANTEED!
• Mandated Climate Controls – Government-mandated emissions monitoring will lead to vehicle shutdowns for exceeding carbon quotas. Even thought it’s one of the biggest scams on the planet, they will continue to control every aspect of your life and drain every last tangible wealth you have until you are accepting UBI credits as your “peasant allowance” with which to scrape by.

In short, the rapid pace of technology is about to hit you in the ass! You won’t even see it coming. Sorry for painting such a rosy picture.  … BUT I CAN’T CHANGE REALITY. Deal with it now or deal with it later. I prefer NOW!

Conclusion: A Future Worth Resisting

The passage of Section 24220 under the guise of road safety is “the most egregious attack” on personal freedom, privacy, and autonomy in modern American history! While the stated intent of preventing impaired driving sounds noble, it is simply a ploy in the WEF’s constant and successful efforts to take complete control of the lives of every living man, woman and child on this planet.

Key Takeaways:

1. Biometric surveillance in cars violates privacy and Fourth Amendment rights.
2. The kill switch creates the ultimate system for controlling your movement and for controlling the population at large… like a herd of sheep!
3. This technology is the first step in ending private car ownership.
4. The expansion of these systems will lead to inevitable government and corporate control over individual behavior. If this fact is left unchecked, what happens?!
5. The American public must push back against these policies before they become permanent.

The promise of governmental and corporate overreach is immense. They tell you what they are doing all the time… and then they do it! If left unchecked, these developments will signal the end of private travel as we know it. It signals the beginning of the complete loss of your own autonomy…  in every aspect of your life. You would do well to reread the book, 1984. You would do well to study the history of every tyrannical government. They all ended in tens of millions dead before each of the regimes lost power. If you aren’t controlling your government, your government is controlling you. And they are never, never, never, never good to you. History is replete with hundreds of millions dead having fallen for a government that will take care of everything for you!

Please share this post on all of your social media platforms. We must take action as a nation of sovereign individuals or we will lose our liberty. What was once a “slow chipping away at our liberty“ has become a complete full-on attack. And it culminates within the decade unless we stop it now.

“The time to resist these changes is now, before personal vehicles become the most tyrannical tool for mass surveillance and authoritarian control to date.”

— Gar —

American National * Gar’s World Private Member Association * No Government or Corporate Contracts
ALL MATERIALS SOURCED ARE UNDER FAIR USE ACT
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * WITHOUT PREJUDICE

---

TAKE ACTION

Contact your legislators and let them know that you vehemently oppose this already existing law and that every effort must be made to repeal section 24220 of 117th Congress’ HR 3684. Contact both by email and telephone. Rarely do you get to speak to the representative directly. Leave your concern with the aid that answers the phone, or leave a message if it is automated.

---

CLICK HERE TO CONTACT YOUR FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVE

---

CLICK HERE TO CONTACT YOUR STATE REPS AND DEMAND LEGISLATION THAT NULLIFIES FEDERAL HR3684 SECTION 24220

You don’t have to set up an account. Just put your address or zip code in and you’ll see your federal and state legislators

HERE IS YOUR CALL SCRIPT:

“Congressman (name). Please support, and create if necessary, legislation that will repeal Section 24220 of the 117th Congress’ HR 3684. This draconian legislation completely eliminates the liberty that the federal government was created to protect.”

SEND VIA EMAIL AND BY PHONE CALL

---

---

COMPLETE TEXT OF HR 3684

Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

SECTION 24220 – ADVANCED IMPAIRED DRIVING TECHNOLOGY

[I usually highlight key elements. But, in this case, you need to digest this entire section and understand the implications for yourself. It is critical to know this; to be able to articulate it to others; and then to… actively articulate it to others, especially your congressmen, senators, counsels, etc.!!! Getting a bill repealed will not happen without your involvement. Your liberty will not return until you demand it.]

(a) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) ADVANCED DRUNK AND IMPAIRED DRIVING PREVENTION TECHNOLOGY.—The term “advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology” means a system that—

(A) can—

(i) passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired; and

(ii) prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if an impairment is detected;

(B) can—

(i) passively and accurately detect whether the blood alcohol concentration of a driver of a motor vehicle is equal to or greater than the blood alcohol concentration described in section 163(a) of title 23, United States Code; and

(ii) prevent or limit motor vehicle operation if a blood alcohol concentration above the legal limit is detected; or

(C) is a combination of systems described in subparagraphs (A) and (B).

(2) PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLE.—The term “passenger motor vehicle” has the meaning given the term in section 32101 of title 49, United States Code.

(b) Findings.—Congress finds that—

(1) alcohol-impaired driving fatalities represent approximately 1⁄3 of all highway fatalities in the United States each year;

(2) in 2019, there were 10,142 alcohol-impaired driving fatalities in the United States;

(3) the estimated economic cost for alcohol-impaired driving crashes in 2010 was $44,000,000,000;

(4) technology that can prevent drunk driving and save lives is available;

(5) to ensure the prevention of alcohol-impaired driving fatalities, advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology should be standard equipment in all new passenger motor vehicles; and

(6) the Federal Government should advance the development and deployment of this technology to address the problem of drunk driving.

(c) Rulemaking.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall issue a final rule prescribing a Federal motor vehicle safety standard under section 30111 of title 49, United States Code, that requires passenger motor vehicles manufactured after the effective date of that standard to be equipped with advanced drunk and impaired driving prevention technology.

(2) TIMING.—

(A) If the Secretary determines that the Federal motor vehicle safety standard required under paragraph (1) cannot meet the requirements and considerations described in section 30111(b) and (f) of title 49, United States Code, by the applicable date, the Secretary—

(i) may extend the time period to such date as the Secretary determines to be necessary, but not later than the date that is 3 years after the date described in paragraph (1); and

(ii) shall submit a report to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives that includes—

(I) an explanation of the reasons for not prescribing the standard by the date described in paragraph (1); and

(II) a detailed timeline for the establishment of the final rule.

(B) If the Secretary determines that the Federal motor vehicle safety standard required under paragraph (1) cannot meet the requirements and considerations described in section 30111(b) and (f) of title 49, United States Code, by the date that is 3 years after the date described in paragraph (1), the Secretary—

(i) shall submit a report to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives that includes—

(I) an explanation of the reasons for not prescribing the standard by that date; and

(II) a detailed timeline for the establishment of the final rule; and

(ii) shall, not later than 1 year after the date on which the report under clause (i) is submitted, prescribe a final rule as described in paragraph (1).

(d) Lead Time.—The compliance date of the rule issued under subsection (c) shall be not earlier than 2 years and not later than 3 years after the date on which the final rule is issued. (e) Agency Resources.—If the Secretary determines that there is a need for additional resources to complete the rulemaking required under subsection (c), the Secretary shall submit a request for those resources to Congress.